The link: Scientists Unveil Missing Link In Evolution (news.sky.com)
A quote:
Scientists have unveiled a 47-million-year-old fossilised skeleton of a monkey hailed as the missing link in human evolution.
The search for a direct connection between humans and the rest of the animal kingdom has taken 200 years – but it was presented to the world today at a special news conference in New York…
Sir David Attenborough said Darwin “would have been thrilled” to have seen the fossil – and says it tells us who we are and where we came from.
“This little creature is going to show us our connection with the rest of the mammals,” he said.
“This is the one that connects us directly with them.
“Now people can say ‘okay we are primates, show us the link’.
“The link they would have said up to now is missing – well it’s no longer missing.”
The above would imply that believers in evolution have been conceding that it hasn’t been proved scientifically that humans evolved from monkeys. So if evolutionists have, up until now, been emphatic that humans evolved from monkeys, and now a evolutionists tells us that the missing link has now been found, which implies that it hadn’t been proved that humans evolved from monkeys, what does that tell us?
It tells us that evolutionists assert claims as scientific proof that aren’t actually scientific proof, which has been fairly obvious to me all along.
A reasonable definition of observation excludes that evolutionists have proved evolution. Huge jumps in logic and lots of extrapolation is what evolutionists add to what they observe in the present. The above news story shows that nothing has changed.
Filed under: Evolution, Logically extended science
